Monday, March 29, 2010

Bangsawan and Malay Cinema

Bangsawan, a ready-made option that was already popular with the masses in Singapore, was easily parlayed in the production of films. Bangsawan performances which were essentially plays of large magnitude that had many song and dance and accompaniment, had interludes between the plays that included elements such as dances, comedy, novelty acts and other entertainment[1]. This character of bangsawan had allowed performances to be changed at will, also allowing a spectrum of cultural influences to be incorporated into the productions in on heavily in film productions[2].

It was in the character of bangsawan to allow for improvisations in order to suit the changing tastes of the audiences[3]. With heavy music requirements, Bangsawan had necessitated the involvement of many singers and musicians in the performances. These bangsawan musicians thus, became the earliest forms of recording artistes in the region which had ridden on the popularity of bangsawan.

Bangsawan circuits had involved constant travelling within the region to put up new performances for the public. In addition to long working hours, bangsawan troupe often dropped and took in new performers at will as the occupation had a low barrier of entry. Such unstable conditions and transient nature meant that life as a bangsawan performer was tough and somewhat unattractive[4]. Therefore, many of these bangsawan performers became enticed by the idea of film because it had offered the opportunity of a stable pay check. Furthermore, filming would allow them to be stationed in one area for a longer period of time, thus eliminating the transient lifestyle that had been predominant in bangsawan troupes. Along with the benefits of having a stable work environment, film offered regular and attractive salaries, along with bonuses and leave packages. When they were not participating in filming, the bangsawan performers were granted the latitude for continuation with their stage performances. Such practices had made the film trade significantly more flexible and thus, more appealing than that of the traditional bangsawan troupe.

The allure of Malay cinema over traditional Bangsawan theatre had been visible as there was a gradual inclination towards cinematography for the performers. This inclination had been observed from Film Melayu, a monthly editorial that was dedicated to the burgeoning film industry in Singapore. A common feature for the columns in Film Melayu was of the Malay films produced by the Shaw Brothers. These columns had given the masses an insight into the lives and thoughts of these bangsawan celebrities. Many of these articles wrote of the tough life of the bangsawan performers as a member of the fluid entertainment environment. Many bangsawan performers that were regularly featured in issues of Film Melayu eventually became the movers and shakers of the Malay film industry. Haji Gong and his wife Tina Madikin, came to Singapore in 1938 with Union Jambi Opera, a travelling Bangsawan troupe. Being acclaimed performers of bangsawan, they were always the centre of attraction to the fans in the region. Both husband and wife began their careers at an early age, travelling and performing on the Malayan bangsawan circuit. Shaw Brothers eventually talent scouted them and signed them on to the fledging Malay Film Production unit. Being marketed as the ‘Malaya’s greatest dramatic actress’, Tina began bringing her star appeal from bangsawan into the film industry[5].

Another featured celebrity of bangsawan in the Film Melayu editorials, was Singapore-born Hamsah Binte Buang. A child star whose mother was also a bangsawan actress, she had no formal education and followed her mother around on circuits. Eventually she began to star in shows across the region which took her to places as far as Bangkok and propelled her to become one of the leading ladies of bangsawan. With her popularity at its peak, she attracted throngs of fervent male admirers. Her journeying days came to an end when she chose to become a mother and went on to participate in films production as a cast and choreographer[6].

From the accounts of these bangsawan performers, it had been apparent that the stability offered by the Malay cinema was winning them over from the traditional theatre. The positive impact of bangsawan on films had been significant albeit, at the expense of eliminating the traditional bangsawan troupes. Tapping on the pool of talent from bangsawan theatre, the local film industry enjoyed a parasitic relation with this traditional art form.



[1] Barnard T. P., “Film Melayu: Nationalism, modernity and film in a pre-World War Two Malay magazine”, Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 41,1 (2010), p. 47-70.

[2] Sulong J., Kaca Permata: Memoir Seorang Pengarah [Through a Lens: The Memoir of a Director] (Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka, 1990), p. 162.

[3] Tan, Bangsawan, p. 1-35.

[4] Cohen M. I., “Border Crossings: Bangsawan in the Netherlands Indies in the Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries”, Indonesia and the Malay World 30,87 (July 2002), p. 101-115.

[5] Haaj, “Riwayat Hidup, Advertisement for Bermadu”, Film Melayu (May 1941), p. 18–19.

[6] Haaj, “Riwayat Hidup Bintang-bintang Film”, Film Melayu (Aug 1941), p. 17–18.

The Demise of Bangsawan

However, not all was well with bangsawan in the world of film. Indian directors, such as B. S. Rajhan were brought in to offer their technical expertise in film productions. However the film contents had to suffer tremendous changes due to harsh translation and heavy Indian influences, which resulted in less than ideal Malay scripts that often did not resonate with the Malay audiences. The Malay community began to express their disdain for poor, foreign sounding Malay as well as unrealistic plots that did not reflect the way of life in Singapore. Bangsawan-based movies such as Mutiara, with plot mechanics such as familial deceit and domestic violence, faced harsh criticism from Malay journalists which claimed that it ‘was not suitable for customary approaches to Malay life[1]. As a result, bangsawan in films began to decline and was phased out due to their inability to mirror the changing lives of the Malays in Singapore. Therefore, newer released films became devoid of traditional elements and instead focused on the juxtaposition of urban mobility and capitalism, reflecting the more relevant and realistic situations of the Malays in Singapore. The plots elements eventually moved away from bangsawan altogether and by 1952, almost none of the films produced by Cathay Keris or Shaw Brothers had bangsawan in them[2].

The changing attitude of the local population was also reflected in the downward spiral of bangsawan. As the Western influence began erode the local values, bangsawan was deemed to be unfashionable as compared to the thespian stage productions of Western descent. The fading prominence of the entertainment parks also created a negative subsidiary effect on bangsawan. As the population moved away from public spheres of amusement and “entertainment for all”, bangsawan lost a platform that previously propelled her to her height of popularity. Consequently, this resulted in the general demise of bangsawan theatres in Singapore.

Facing the severe lack of funding and a waning response from the audience, bangsawan saw the change in interests of the general public. Singapore, being at the centre of trade and a meeting place of ideas, had seen the influx of overwhelming external influences[3]. This globalization of ideas and ideals thus began a slow but undeniable erosion of traditional values of the Malay world. These compounded effects had manifested in the attrition and final elimination of bangsawan as a popular culture in Singapore.

With the advent of Malay nationalism in Singapore and Malaya in the 1950s, ASOS 50 (Angkatan Sasterawan 50), a group of concerned Malay writers and artists was formed. In view of the continued erosion of the Malay culture in films and other popular mediums, this organization of Malay intelligentsia began to stand up to the film industry, calling for Malays to take control of content in films so that customary Malay culture could be better represented. While traditional bangsawan could not find their way back to films, their elements were invoked as being part of the authentic Malay culture and were incorporated back into films in order to re-establish Malay films as a vehicle of Malay nationalism and identity. By inserting bangsawan-inspired Malay songs and dance routines into films, the ASOS 50 attempted to impede the rot caused by the social juggernaut of invading cultures[4].

The use of bangsawan as an avenue for Malay consciousness and nationalism had reflected the ideals of the Malay elites of that generation. The increasing multicultural bangsawan and its eventually fall from grace was seen as a symbol that rendered Malay culture as an anachronism. In order to recapture this traditionally Malay domain, the intelligentsia attempted to remove the multicultural elements that had made bangsawan popular since the days of the amusement parks.



[1] “Ruangan Alam Cinema”, Warta Jenaka (Aug 1940), p. 11-12.

[2] Ahmad H., Traditional Theatre in Southeast Asia: Bangsawan in Singapore, A Historical Perspective (Singapore: UniPress for SPAFA, 1995), p. 88.

[3] Page M. E., Colonialism: An International, Social, Cultural, and Political Encyclopedia (Vol. 1) (ABC-CLIO, 1995), p. 118.

[4] Karim N. S. et.al., Memoranda Angkatan Sastrawan '50 (2nd ed) (Petaling Jaya: Fajar Bakt), p. 156 – 164.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the evolution of bangsawan was clearly linked to changes that took place at the societal level. Bangsawan had transformed from serving the traditional purposes of spiritual appeasement and thanksgiving for bountiful harvests to an informal and casual commercial theatre for the urbanites and finally, to a formal platform for political contestations. This was taking place in parallel with the modernization and industrialization of Singapore society, which was pluralizing the racial and ethnic make-up of the population. The cultural assimilation of the bangsawan with other art forms was a clear manifestation of the synergistic relationship between the popular culture and society. Furthermore, the rise of bangsawan also brought about radical societal change in the social status of females in the conservative Asian context. In addition, the innovative and adaptability of bangsawan to other novelties ensured its popularity amongst the masses during the early twentieth century. However, bangsawan began to decline around post war period and finally, died a natural death as a popular culture of Singapore when artificial intervention from the Malay Intelligentsia stifled its innovation. Hence, looking back upon the trajectory of bangsawan as a popular culture, one could identify with the micro-history that was taking place in Singapore.

Sunday, March 28, 2010

Picture Gallery

Students practicing “extra turns” – interludes performed between the scenes that can include song, pantomine, comedy, novelty acts, and dance.

Catherine Diamond, “Parallel Streams: Two Currents of Difference in Kuala Lumpur's Contemporary Theatre”, The MIT Press 46,2 (Summer 2002), p. 15.

Students performing in a production of the bangsawan Haris Fadillah (1997), directed by Rahman B. and Rosminah Tahrit.

Catherine Diamond, “Parallel Streams: Two Currents of Difference in Kuala Lumpur's Contemporary Theatre”, The MIT Press 46,2 (Summer 2002), p. 15.

A Shaw Brothers poster promoting a Bangsawan film.

"Poster: Indera Bangsawan." Online image. 1961. Filem Malaysia. 30 Mar. 2010.

A newspaper article about a revival in Bangsawan in 1998.

"Meski Bisu Bangsawan Tidak Sunyi Kre.” Online image. 1998. BERITA HARIAN. 30 Mar. 2010.